<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hypatia dot ca &#187; facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hypatia.ca/tag/facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hypatia.ca</link>
	<description>Leigh Honeywell&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 05:28:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tweets?  In /my/ Facebook?</title>
		<link>http://hypatia.ca/2009/01/tweets-in-my-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://hypatia.ca/2009/01/tweets-in-my-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leigh Honeywell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypatia.ca/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s more likely than you think!
While some people are very frustrated by the occasional spamminess of Twitter -&#62; Facebook posting, and others posit that Facebook will eventually kill Twitter because the &#8220;conversation moves there&#8221;, I just like being able to update both places at once and don&#8217;t really care to make predictions either way.
Instead I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s more likely than you think!</p>
<p>While <a href="http://www.prblogger.com/2008/03/tweeters-stop-spamming-my-facebook/">some people</a> are very frustrated by the occasional spamminess of Twitter -&gt; Facebook posting, and <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/14244/why-facebook-may-already-be-killing-twitter/">others posit</a> that Facebook will eventually kill Twitter because the &#8220;conversation moves there&#8221;, I just like being able to update both places at once and don&#8217;t really care to make predictions either way.</p>
<p>Instead I want to post a quick field guide to Twitter for Facebook users.  Not because they should particularly go ahead and sign up, but to make clearer what all the @this and #that&#8217;s crapping up their news feeds are.  Because they do tend to open dialogs and conversations, but can be confusing sometimes too &#8211; I definitely think about how something will work on my FB feed before posting to Twitter.</p>
<p><span id="more-87"></span></p>
<h2>The basics</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>#hashtags</strong> are probably the least intuitive thing for non-Twitter-users.  They are basically keywords which Twitter users track threads on <a href="http://search.twitter.com/">Twitter Search</a>.  Twitter used to have a &#8220;track&#8221; feature which made following them way less of a pain, but it got killed when they had uptime and reliability issues last spring; the tools adapted, and now some have built in search.</li>
<li>Mentions of <strong>@people</strong> by their @nickname.  Facebook doesn&#8217;t link these @names to the appropriate profile, but if you want to see who the heck @hypatiadotca is, just go to http://twitter.com/hypatiadotca .  People at least usually have pictures, if not their real names, on their Twitter profiles which helps sort out name-&gt;nick mapping issues :)</li>
<li><strong>Retweets</strong>, or RT, are just reposts from another user&#8217;s feed.  These are somewhat like the ping or trackbacks of the blogging world.  There&#8217;s no standard syntax for these though RT seems to be preferred for sheer concision.</li>
</ul>
<h2>The annoyances</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>tw-words</strong>: tweets, tweeple, twits, twitterati&#8230; the only ones anyone really uses are &#8220;tweet&#8221; to describe a message on Twitter, and twits to describe users.  The latter is hilarious, all the other portmanteaus are just irritating.  If you actually want to know, there&#8217;s a <a href="http://mashable.com/2008/11/15/twitterspeak/">list</a> of what they all mean, supposedly.</li>
<li><strong>@replies</strong>: Facebook users, in theory, <small>when the Twitter/Facebook app is working correctly,</small> shouldn&#8217;t see these as they are filtered.  Twitter conversations flow weirdly enough on the site itself or clients, let alone Facebook where one side may not be cross-posting their feed.  The app occasionally misbehaves, however, and I&#8217;m sorry for all the times I&#8217;ve crapped up your feed with @replies.</li>
<li><strong>lack of @username linking</strong>: I really wish either FB or Twitter would just do something like &#8220;if app posting to status == Twitter, replace all @username references with a link to twitter.com/username&#8221;.  Sigh.  A corollary to this is that unless users have added the Twitter app box to their Boxes page, there&#8217;s no way to find out what their Twitter username is.  Grump.</li>
<li><strong>overall volume</strong>: yes, some twits are spammy.  There&#8217;s even a measure for it, the &#8220;<a href="http://followcost.com/about/milliscoble">scoble</a>&#8220;, which is how annoying a person is compared to <a href="http://scobleizer.com/">Robert Scoble</a> who tweets approximately a hojillion times per hour.  Consider turning down spammy users in Facebook&#8217;s settings via the &#8220;see less from this user&#8221; option.</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ll of course be posting this on Twitter, which posts to my Facebook, and would be interested in any other weird &#8220;gotchas&#8221; that Facebook users have experienced.</p>
<p>-Leigh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hypatia.ca/2009/01/tweets-in-my-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
